You are here: Home: CCU 2 | 2003: Howard S Hochster, MD


Howard S Hochster, MD

Professor of Medicine,
Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology,
New York University Medical Center

Edited comments by Dr Hochster

Use of oxaliplatin-containing regimens as first-line treatment of metastatic disease

I have been very impressed with the responses in my practice to oxaliplatinbased therapy. There does not appear to be a difference in response rates across first-line studies of various combinations — whether FOLFOX, FOLFIRI or IFL — but the studies do not reflect the magnitude of responses I’ve seen in clinical practice — for example, patients with extensive liver metastases in whom an oxaliplatin-containing regimen reduced the tumor burden to one or two sites. While that’s still a partial response, the amount of cytoreduction by oxaliplatin is impressive.

The data suggest you can administer either irinotecan or oxaliplatin as first-line therapy, but there’s been a paradigm shift. Intergroup N9741 demonstrated clear superiority of FOLFOX 4 with oxaliplatin and infusonal 5-FU over a bolus IFL regimen, and I’m not sure that the results would have been different if infusional 5-FU had been used with irinotecan. Patients tolerate oxaliplatin better, and the responses are more impressive. Off study, I’m using a modified FOLFOX regimen, with leucovorin on day one followed by a 46-hour 5-FU infusion after a bolus.

Systemic therapy of patients presenting with metastatic disease

I have treated quite a few patients in this situation, without resecting the primary tumor. Many patients could have undergone surgery, but with a large number of liver metastases, our paradigm has shifted. We give chemotherapy first to see if we can reduce the liver metastases to an operable volume, then we remove the residual liver disease and the primary at the same time. I recall a woman who presented with minimal GI symptoms. Colonoscopy revealed a lesion involving approximately 30 percent of the circumference of the colon, but it was not obstructive. The lesion wasn’t friable and bleeding was minimal, but she had abnormal liver function tests, right upper quadrant discomfort and extensive hepatic metastases.

After six months of FOLFOX, she was restaged for consideration of surgery, and her colon was absolutely clear of tumor by endoscopy and CT scan. The area presumed to have been the primary tumor was biopsied, and she appeared to have a complete pathologic remission of the primary tumor. She also had a partial response of the liver metastases; a small volume of tumor remained, but it was too diffuse for resection.

Local therapy for liver metastases

Local therapy for liver metastases is a real “Pandora’s box.” We have numerous ways to treat gross liver metastases — resection, freezing, microwaving, embolizing, injecting itrium-labeled glass spheres or ethanol. Unfortunately, none of these extend survival. This is a very difficult concept to communicate to patients.

Most people believe that you’re going to live longer if you can resect the metastases. Sometimes that’s true, especially if you have another chemotherapy to administer after the resection. Local therapies need to be coupled with effective chemotherapy; otherwise, you’re just treating the gross disease. I look forward to any trial demonstrating the role of local therapies. The only one demonstrating any survival benefit is resection of a solitary liver metastasis followed by 5-FU. Hopefully, the cooperative groups will address these questions with appropriate clinical trials.

Management of patients with metastatic disease and poor performance status

I use combination chemotherapy — oxaliplatin/5-FU or irinotecan/5-FU regimens — in otherwise healthy patients with poor performance status that is disease-related. I recall a few patients who presented with severe debilitation, extensive liver involvement and intrahepatic jaundice, whose primary care physicians wanted to refer to hospice.

I treated those patients with combination chemotherapy; they have responded favorably, and have been resurrected with improvement in performance status and reduced jaundice. The key was to treat them with appropriate doses — to use dose reductions if necessary — and to initially proceed very slowly. With older patients, who may have cardiac problems and other comorbidities, I may use single-agent fluoropyrimidines.

Prevention of oxaliplatin-related neuropathy

Erick Gamelin, a neurologist who works with Aimery de Gramont, studied the neurophysiology of oxaliplatin-associated neuropathy. He discovered the oxalato portion of oxaliplatin actually becomes a chelating agent once it’s dissolved from the platinum. Oxalato strips off the bivalent cations (calcium and magnesium), opens up sodium channels and causes an intense depolarization that can damage nerves. He postulated that administration of calcium and magnesium salts before and after oxaliplatin administration could prevent depolarization.

Gamelin presented data from a nonrandomized study comparing patients treated with calcium and magnesium salts before and after oxaliplatin to those who were untreated with the cation salts. The treated patients had much less acute neuropathy and could tolerate greater cumulative doses.

We use this Gamelin approach as our standard of care in patients treated with oxaliplatin. Patients uniformly report much less acute neurotoxicity. Our patients receive much more oxaliplatin because they don’t have to discontinue treatment due to cumulative neuropathy. I believe this regimen will reduce Grade II and III neuropathy by one-half. A Phase III trial in Europe is currently evaluating this approach, so we’ll soon have confirmation of its effectiveness.

Challenges in treatment decision-making

Oncologists are struggling to determine the most appropriate candidates for combination chemotherapy, which agents should be utilized and how 5-FU should be administered. If you treat many patients with colorectal cancer, it’s easier to adapt to administering infusional therapy, but in the United States, the use of infusional therapy has many barriers, including insurance-related concerns. Randomized studies will inform us if we need to use infusional 5-FU or if we can substitute an oral agent, such as capecitabine.

Select publications

 

 

Table of Contents Top of Page

Home

Editor’s Note
 
Howard S Hochster, MD
- Select publications
 
James L Abbruzzese, MD
- Select publications
 
Al B Benson, III, MD, FACP
- Select publications
 
James N Atkins, MD
- Select publications

Faculty Disclosures

Editor's office

 

Terms of use and general disclaimer
© NL Communications, Inc. 2002. All rights reserved.